Over-the-Top ACL-R with LET

Search

OTT 25 Year Experience

OTT Technique Guide

Benefits of OTT+LET

About Rizzoli Ortho Institute

Instagram

Over-the-Top ACL-R with LET

OTT 25 Year Experience

OTT Technique Guide

Benefits of OTT+LET

Vascular Graft

No Femur Tunnel

Biomechanically Stable

Close-to-Anatomical

25 Year Ultra-Long Outcomes

Proven in Elite and Adolescents

Outcomes Compared

About Rizzoli Ortho Institute

©️ 2026

Instagram
OTT + LET ACL-R
/
Biomechanical Evidence

Biomechanical Evidence

OTT🔬 Biomechanical Studies

image
‣
OTT Reduces Coupled Tibial Translation (KSSTA 2009, Bignozzi et al.)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18982310/

  • 👥 Patient population: 28 consecutive patients (mean age 30 years) undergoing single-bundle hamstring ACL reconstruction with over-the-top femoral fixation plus extra-articular plasty
  • 📍 Study design:
    1. In vivo, intra-operative computer-assisted navigation measured AP tibial translation at

    2. 30° (Lachman)
    3. 90° (drawer test)
    4. across medial, central, and lateral compartments

  • 📉 Effect of single-bundle (SB) graft:
    • Reduced AP translation ~4.8 mm at 30°
    • Reduced ~3.2 mm at 90°
    • Primary stabilizer for anterior translation

  • ➕ Added effect of extra-articular (EA) plasty:
    • Further reduced lateral compartment translation by 1.6 mm at 30°
    • Reduced AP laxity by ~1 mm at 90°
    • Significant control of coupled tibial translation, especially in the lateral compartment

  • 🔬 Key biomechanical insight:
  • Extra-articular plasty improves control of residual rotational/lateral laxity not fully addressed by single-bundle reconstruction alone

‣
OTT vs Non-Anatomic Double Bundle (NADB): Static Similar, Dynamic Different ( KSSTA 2012, Zaffagnini et al.)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21710111/

  • 👥 Patient population: 35 consecutive patients with isolated chronic ACL injury
    • Anatomic Double-Bundle (ADB): 15 patients
    • Over-the-Top Single-Bundle + Lateral Plasty (SBLP): 20 patients
  • 📊 Static laxity (AP, VV, IE tests):
  • Both techniques significantly reduced anterior–posterior, varus/valgus, and rotational laxity.

    Overall static stability was similar between groups.

  • ➕ Lateral compartment control (SBLP advantage):
    1. Extra-articular tenodesis better restrained:

    2. Lateral compartment AP translation (especially at 90°)
    3. Varus/valgus opening at 0° and 30°
    4. Rotational displacement at 90°
  • 🔄 Dynamic stability (ADB advantage):
    1. Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction better controlled:

    2. Pivot-shift phenomenon
    3. Peak anterior displacement of lateral compartment
    4. Hysteresis area during pivot-shift
    5. Tibial reduction acceleration
  • 🧠 Key insight:
  • Over-the-top + lateral plasty enhances peripheral/lateral compartment control

    while anatomic double-bundle more closely restores dynamic rotational behavior.

‣
OTT vs Single Bundle vs NADB: OTT Provides Greater Static Laxity Reduction Than SB and Non-Anatomic DB (Clin Biomech 2019, Grassi et al.)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31260843/

  • 👥 Patient population: 42 patients (mean age 26 ± 8 years) with isolated ACL injury, randomized into:
    • Single-Bundle (SB)
    • Single-Bundle + Lateral Plasty (SBLP, over-the-top)
    • Non-anatomic Double-Bundle (DB)
  • 📉 All techniques reduced laxity compared to preoperative values across AP, IE, VV, and pivot-shift tests.
  • 🥇 SBLP showed the greatest AP reduction at 90°
  • Superior to DB (p = 0.012); trend vs SB.

  • 🔄 Superior rotational control (SBLP):
  • Greater reduction in internal–external rotation at 30° and 90° compared to both SB and DB (p < 0.05).

  • 🦴 Lateral compartment restraint:
  • SBLP better controlled lateral tibial translation during drawer and rotational stress tests.

  • 🎯 Pivot shift:
  • No significant difference among techniques for dynamic pivot-shift reduction.